Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course there is, if she claims CMS then a DNA test is the ONLY way that will resolve the issue. The court will order it’s done.Agree. Although there is no onus on her to prove paternity if she claims CMS it seems.
Ive seen a solicitor.I'm not so sure about that. The info above was from a reputable site. Gov site says this. Basically it means you have to pay if she says you're the Father unless you say you're not. But then they want proof. And you have to pay until there's proof you're not, then you get a refund. She has no incentive to get proof as she's getting paid. So the onus would be on you to prove you're not. That's how I read it anyway.
But yes you want proof one way or the other, if she is saying you're the Dad. Or just let it go and hope she doesn't ask for CMS. If she decides to two years later they could send you a backdated bill until you prove otherwise I think.
I don't want to add to your worries though. You don't think she will claim CMS from what she's said about bringing the child up on her own. And in some ways maybe it's better not to know definitely as if a test proved you were the Father you'd still need to decide whether to be involved or not. But surely she must realise you can't agree to be involved if you don't know for certain you're the Dad! She should just agree to a legal dna test after birth.
Child Maintenance Service
How to set up or manage a child maintenance arrangement, including what to do if a parent does not pay, how to contact the Child Maintenance Service, and signing in to your account.www.gov.uk
I think we may have got crossed wires.I was just linking the articles with info on it from the .gov website - good that you have had advice from a solicitor.
This forum is to help people with things and we usually say get legal advice if you're not sure and need something confirmed. I linked some info that said different to your solicitor. I don't personally know which is correct but perhaps ask another solicitor and see if they say the same.
The local pharmacy to buy Durex?where can I run fast and hard to haha
We arent Separated though, we have never been together.Good if a solicitor has confirmed this. Society is a mess so nothing would surprise me! Especially re separated parents.
At this point in time though I’m not classed as a parent, let alone a separated one. I won’t be on that birth certificate.In terms of parenting now though, you're classed as separated parents even though you were never together If it moved on to agreeing schedules for parenting and you were involved. And it starts with DNA tests! If DNA test shows you're not the Father, then no you're not separate/separated parents.
Possibly but she’s stressed enough times that I dont have to be involved from the off so I think deep down that’s what she wants, to be a single mum but morally felt she had to tell a “father” it was his.I know it’s a difficult situation you’re in. And you have time to think now anyway. Of course you don’t want to get involved if you don’t know if you’re the Dad or not. But one thing to consider might be - if she does do a legal dna test after birth and you are the Dad - it could be more difficult to be amicable then if she has had the mindset that you weren’t going to be involved throughout the pregnancy.
In a way if she continues to refuse a legal dna test then you know where you are and problem solved. But she maybe only offered the prenatal test thinking you wanted to know asap if you were the Dad or not.
Anyway good that you’ve had some legal advice and see what happens.
Not too sure yet Ash, dont want to celebrate yet but is yet more red flagsIt seems to have worked itself out then.
That’s the thing, it’s a finger prick of blood you do yourself, because it’s not court ordered theres no doctors involved, it’s like how a diabetic tests their blood Each day. She might want to be a single mother and give someone else’s blood OR knowing this woman IF it came back and I wasn’t the father I could still see her accusing me of faking the test. It’s just how it is. Also the legal advice I got was not to do it. I don’t think it would be true peace of mind.This is when it becomes more real and human. I went through that too. Then it’s - I’m having a child. I ended up taking ex’s word for it and from that point he was mine anyway - especially once he was born and I looked after him.
So you’re in a difficult position brcshse you want to know if he is yours.
Maybe try not to think of that pre test as stupid and rubbish but a way of having a high degree of certainty. It can’t be fudged because the Mother needs a blood test which would be done by a Doctor. Personally I would accept a 99% pre test. It might not be a legal test but a legal test is only really needed if you want to prove it’s not yours. Kind of.
You can’t have a legal test till the baby is born and by then she’s of the mindset it’s hers and you’re not involved - then if court orders a test and he os yours , things get harder because sge’s been through the whole psychological process of being a single Mum throughout the pregnancy and birth.
I think the whole idea of the pre test os it’s a “peace of mind test”. If it showed you weren’t the Father then that’s that. If it showed you were then it almost certainly is your child. I am not even sure that the legal test id more than 99% accurate.
The main idea of the legal test is legally prove it’s been done correctly for a court - but if you’re both there when the pre test is done - you know it’s been done correctly. And it would be a lot cheaper than a court case.
It’s good there is a mutual friend but it’s still something that needs resolving. There are two peoples emotions, fears and futures involved (three really). But ex wants to know if you’re going to be involved or not so she can make decisions about her life and make plans. You want to know so you know whether to be involved. It’s a catch 22 situation and the only thing that will give any answers is this pre natal test.
I don’t think she would have agreed to do that if she had any doubts or was yours.
There is still the possibility after birth of having a court ordered test if you have doubts. But as soon as my son was born I knew he was mine by a particular physical feature. He didn’t look like either of us at that age but they have fingers, toes, and other bodily genetics.
I would email her (or ask the mutual friend to speak to her) and just say - if it’s your child you want to be involved but need certainty and think that will give peace of mind for all and build trust from that point. That’s it not that you don’t want to trust her but these are complex things and you don’t know each other that well and you appreciate her offer of the pre natal test and you are happy to do this so decisions can be made by both of you.