Sorry - didn’t mean to cast a negative light on things. I was just going to say something else - Some of what happens might depend on the history. And what evidence you have at final hearing.
And you’ve just mentioned that. If there’s a history of her being disruptive then that would count against her having daughter live with her abroad. Especially if you have good evidence with your final statement showing her attitude and examples of the disruption and putting her own wishes before daughter’s needs.
I just don’t think they can prevent your ex moving to Poland. What they can do is either prevent your daughter moving to Poland or do a 50/50 order with daughter living in both countries at various times.
Presumably you could argue that ex is likely to not follow an order if she’s abroad due to the history.
What was the timing of her announcing her intention to move? In my case it was straight after final hearing! It was U.K. though so not as bad but the Judge basically hinted to her that it wasn’t a good idea and he was sure she wasn’t really going to move was she? In other words hinting she might lose residency if she did - which was a good bit of leverage. Ultimately she had to sign an undertaking not to move out of the region without having mediation to discuss charges to schedules (in other words to give me time to put in another PSO so she couldn’t do a moonlight flit).
She didn’t move.
That’s the kind of thing that can help - leverage arguments - but depends how maverick your ex is.
When it comes to Cafcass they don’t like to see hostility between parents and see that as harmful to the child so as a Dad you need to show you have tried to co parebt amicably and the hostility is one sided. Or the Mother is manipulating the child and you want an order that protects child from manipulation.
I don’t know the full history and maybe you have strong evidence to show ex is unlikely to follow court orders if she moved abroad.
Why did ex’s barrister write that order? It would normally be your barrister if it was your application. Or was it ex’s application for permission to move?
And you’ve just mentioned that. If there’s a history of her being disruptive then that would count against her having daughter live with her abroad. Especially if you have good evidence with your final statement showing her attitude and examples of the disruption and putting her own wishes before daughter’s needs.
I just don’t think they can prevent your ex moving to Poland. What they can do is either prevent your daughter moving to Poland or do a 50/50 order with daughter living in both countries at various times.
Presumably you could argue that ex is likely to not follow an order if she’s abroad due to the history.
What was the timing of her announcing her intention to move? In my case it was straight after final hearing! It was U.K. though so not as bad but the Judge basically hinted to her that it wasn’t a good idea and he was sure she wasn’t really going to move was she? In other words hinting she might lose residency if she did - which was a good bit of leverage. Ultimately she had to sign an undertaking not to move out of the region without having mediation to discuss charges to schedules (in other words to give me time to put in another PSO so she couldn’t do a moonlight flit).
She didn’t move.
That’s the kind of thing that can help - leverage arguments - but depends how maverick your ex is.
When it comes to Cafcass they don’t like to see hostility between parents and see that as harmful to the child so as a Dad you need to show you have tried to co parebt amicably and the hostility is one sided. Or the Mother is manipulating the child and you want an order that protects child from manipulation.
I don’t know the full history and maybe you have strong evidence to show ex is unlikely to follow court orders if she moved abroad.
Why did ex’s barrister write that order? It would normally be your barrister if it was your application. Or was it ex’s application for permission to move?