Guest viewing is limited

To non-mol or not to non-mol

BrassTacks

Experienced member
Member
Very grateful for all the advice and insights so far.
We’re quite a way down multiple proceedings…. My ex has tried to kick me out, withhold contact, and tried to make significant financial decisions resulting in me obtaining an injunction to prevent her from selling our / my assets.

She’s been physically and verbally abusive and physically and verbally abusive to both children (5 and 14).

When I made the occupation application, which was granted by consent but is now being reinstated by the ex, I made a non-mol application but stated I did not want to rely on it at this time hoping things would get resolved.

My ex subsequently made a non-mol application with loads of false allegations (had me arrested 2X with NFA and third time I managed to show the police a court order so they didn’t arrest me) over the past 6 months.

CAFCASS and social services are NFA.
My ex agreed for me to have 80:20 care temporarily while she resolves her medical issues then 50:50 within a year (although I’m not sure if this is genuine.. her barrister starter formalising this but then not heard from him.)

Non-mol ex-parte application by ex was refused. At the f2f hearing it was thrown out, and a new witness statement ordered.
At next hearing the judge tried to encourage undertakings vs proceeding with fact finding: ex INSISTED on fact finding…. So I asked for the opportunity to provide a witness statement too…. which will feature her physical, verbal and financial abuse against me and the former two on the children. There is reasonable evidence and witnesses and a couple of false allegations that were witnessed (hence NFA by police).

In responding to her witness statement I feel I’ve covered most things (initially around 149 allegations then around 50 in the witness statement I was ordered to respond to).

She’s also refusing to give me the child passport, and making everything as difficult as possible… to the extreme.

Frustratingly my ex has twisted the confrontations around making me out to be the instigator, when I experienced it the other way around (saying that it take two to tango). From what I read here and hear from barristers; the more mud that a woman flings, the more chance something will stick.
Men don’t seem to come out of this positively, sadly.
I don’t understand the reason she’s perusing with the non-mol, other than perhaps to get legal aid (which she said she was trying to ask for) which means the 50:50 agreement is possibly a smoke screen.

Fortunately I put in top-line summaries of the abuse (mostly historic at that time) in my first application preceding hers.

I’m contemplating how to write the witness statement.
VERY concerned that the child focus will be lost which is what I expressed in court.
We have non-mol, contact, specific issues and finances to deal with.
If social services get involved again I worry they’ll only see the continued acrimony.

I’d value your thoughts and advice on how to proceed with the witness statement and try keep it child focussed; bearing in mind it’s a non-mol witness statement.
My initial view was to feature the children as much as possible - and limit the statement to the most serious assaults and issues…. Rather than detail every argument and incident …. Legal advise was to detail every incident as a strategy.

Appreciate your views on this devastating end to a relationship where the kids at most certainly gong to be negatively affected and the ex is determined to criminalise the end of the relationship farther than focus on moving forward with the interests of the children in mind.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like you could do with the help of a lawyer with this one. Even if it's just a one off fee to help write the statement. Do you have it in writing (eg text) that she offered 80/20 in your favour?
 
She’s nefarious and calculated: esp as she now has legal support.

It must be to get freee legal support. The 50:50 contact was such a huge issue for her she absolutely refused to budge on….
Really not sure on the way forward. Will have to look at legal advice.
 
If she gets the non mol then it means someone has to move out of the house - and I'm wondering if that is the strategy - to get you to move out - a non mol might override the injunction - possibly.
 
Ok. That does make sense and the reason I thought she made the original non-mol.
what’s odd is that my allegations are far more serious than what she’s portraying.
Very odd.
In reality I’d say without the older boy who stays with his dad 5/14 days and 1/2 holidays, she’d have to leave.
She is trying everything she can to get me out, and has been saying she’ll have me out within the next two weeks repeatedly over the last week.

Worth considering @Ash - thanks for putting the time in to think about this.

I Can’t understand how she can remove me quickly as proceedings are on going.
 
If a non mol is made that says you can't go within x metres of her then someone would have to move out, regardless of other proceedings.
 
Back
Top