Hello
I have my DRA tomorrow and I have questioned Cafcass over the way the report was written.
Essentially, I challenged the person who interviewed me and asked why she did not include behaviour of the ex that I think was bad and that I think affects my son today.
She replied with this:
I found this realisation very sobering (as well as infuriating!) and now I undertand that there is little point arguing.
Is this a fair assessment of the process?
I have my DRA tomorrow and I have questioned Cafcass over the way the report was written.
Essentially, I challenged the person who interviewed me and asked why she did not include behaviour of the ex that I think was bad and that I think affects my son today.
She replied with this:
This made me realise that the point of the S7 is to analyse me and my behaviours / actions - it is irrelevant to the report what the ex has done as she is not the one subject to the report.I take on board the points you have raised in your email. I would highlight that the focus of my report is on exploring the concerns raised that are of relevance to my assessment and the decisions the Court are being asked to make.
I found this realisation very sobering (as well as infuriating!) and now I undertand that there is little point arguing.
Is this a fair assessment of the process?