I have a final hearing infront of magistrates. A really awkward abrupt legal advisor at the DRA did not accept my proposal to list the case Infront of a judge due to cultural, race and religion not taken into account in the section 7 report nor was either parent seen with their child (except my contact centre reports) and alienating behaviours of RP (mother). Section 7 state no safeguarding except hostility between 2 parents even though I am saying I have 0 hostility. Recommendation is for spends time with me and lives with mother.
Child is 5 - wishes are to be with me.
Mother is capping my involvement to try and extort me financially via the CMS. All of her statements claim to do what's best for child's interest but it's all lies. We are both LIP.
Can I turn this around or am I doomed? I have the opportunity to cross examine cafcass officer. Can a cafcass officer change their mind? I can't believe the angry/hostile and abusive RPs get default lives with order and the more abuse they give the less time we have due to 'hostilty between parents' even if you don't react.
Child is 5 - wishes are to be with me.
Mother is capping my involvement to try and extort me financially via the CMS. All of her statements claim to do what's best for child's interest but it's all lies. We are both LIP.
Can I turn this around or am I doomed? I have the opportunity to cross examine cafcass officer. Can a cafcass officer change their mind? I can't believe the angry/hostile and abusive RPs get default lives with order and the more abuse they give the less time we have due to 'hostilty between parents' even if you don't react.