Thanks
@Pj66 . Really confused what option to go for. Can you also use a c2 to enforce instead of a c79? My intention is to view what I have as an interim consent order. To fight for it to be enforced ahead of the Review Hearing in August where the judge can direct us to a final hearing seeing that this interim order is not fit for purpose.
I have not gone through this yet and still in the process, perhaps someone else will be able to clarify,
But from my perspective, you could use the c2 for a directions on the typo and vagueness of the order, claim you feel it's being used by the mother to breach, (technically as the wording stands, she isn't breaching if all contact with any parties is to be agreed between parties?)
Then ask for it to be amended and get the judge to confirm it as an interim order for a final hearing in August, which you would then use as an opportunity to get a final order more suitable. Ask for the wording to be more specific and have it corrected that it is indeed an interim that was agreed by both parties.
It would then be like a "pseudo" enforcement hearing , without the slap on the wrist to the mother but may still make her clean her act up as she will be concerned you could vary and get more in the August hearing, and also shows you are not letting up on the pressure.
I do really feel that a barrister may be necessary for you here though mate as it's now getting complex, I can see her barrister trying to railroad this again.
Im just spitballing but il let someone else jump in on this.