Guest viewing is limited

Feel positive after Fhdra

Altitude60

New member
Member
I recently attended my FHDR and overall, I feel the outcome was somewhat favorable. While there are some hurdles I need to navigate, which I find frustrating, I understand the court's cautious approach, particularly due to the allegations my ex made to Cafcass. However, both Cafcass and the court appeared to give little weight to these allegations, as they were not a significant focus during the proceedings.

My ex attempted to impose restrictive / limit contact arrangements in the hearing and gave multiple reasons why but the court said there has to be progression and has ordered indirect contact for an initial 8-week period. This involves sending letters and small gifts to demonstrate my consistency. Following this, I will have two-hour supervised visits every fortnight, with video or phone calls on the alternate weeks. The supervised visits will gradually increase by an hour every session over an additional 8 weeks. These arrangements actually provide more contact time than I previously had with my ex's original arrangement.

Cafcass recommended that unsupervised visits should eventually take place, but this was not finalised in court. I believe the intention is for my ex and me to communicate and agree on this in the future. As planning together for children course was ordered, If we are unable to reach an agreement, a contested hearing will take place in May, where both parties will need to produce statements.

I am feeling optimistic about the current arrangements but have a couple of questions:

1. What would be considered appropriate small gifts for the indirect contact period?


2. Do you have any advice on how I should prepare or conduct myself during this six-month period leading up to the contested hearing?

Thanks all
 
I recently attended my FHDR and overall, I feel the outcome was somewhat favorable. While there are some hurdles I need to navigate, which I find frustrating, I understand the court's cautious approach, particularly due to the allegations my ex made to Cafcass. However, both Cafcass and the court appeared to give little weight to these allegations, as they were not a significant focus during the proceedings.

My ex attempted to impose restrictive / limit contact arrangements in the hearing and gave multiple reasons why but the court said there has to be progression and has ordered indirect contact for an initial 8-week period. This involves sending letters and small gifts to demonstrate my consistency. Following this, I will have two-hour supervised visits every fortnight, with video or phone calls on the alternate weeks. The supervised visits will gradually increase by an hour every session over an additional 8 weeks. These arrangements actually provide more contact time than I previously had with my ex's original arrangement.

Cafcass recommended that unsupervised visits should eventually take place, but this was not finalised in court. I believe the intention is for my ex and me to communicate and agree on this in the future. As planning together for children course was ordered, If we are unable to reach an agreement, a contested hearing will take place in May, where both parties will need to produce statements.

I am feeling optimistic about the current arrangements but have a couple of questions:

1. What would be considered appropriate small gifts for the indirect contact period?


2. Do you have any advice on how I should prepare or conduct myself during this six-month period leading up to the contested hearing?

Thanks all
Forgot to add
3. Any tips for the supervised visit period ?
 
How old are your children and when did you last see them?

This progressed 'contact' business is bulls**t. You are their father. Not some random. Sorry it does really anger me.
 
How old are your children and when did you last see them?

This progressed 'contact' business is bulls**t. You are their father. Not some random. Sorry it does really anger me.
It has now been six months since I last saw my child, when contact was abruptly stopped. While this situation is undoubtedly frustrating, I want to highlight that my ex had previously only allowed me two hours of contact every two weeks, with no additional opportunities to engage . Just wanting to spend time with my child i foolish thought thing's would get better with time and increase untill she cut all contact.

Although I am now limited to eight weeks of indirect contact followed by eight weeks of supervised contact increasing by a hour every visit , this does provide me with more time than I was previously permitted.

So I now feel positive about the contested hearing come May .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ash
Sorry, I didn't mean to rain on your parade.
It just really bugs me that dad's get treated like a threat to their own child.
 
Back
Top