Hi all. My first post here. I've had a look through various websites including this one but I can't find any concrete answer to my question. Hoping someone can help or point me in the right direction.
I pay child maintenance weekly. This is arranged through child maintenance service.
My ex is now saying that as I have my child for meal times (not overnight) that I am solely responsible for providing those meals.
Now, I will obviously never allow my daughter to go without a meal however as a matter of principle I would like to show that by providing meals when my daughter is with me that I am actually going above and beyond as, the payment that I make through child maintenance meets my obligation to provide the essentials for our daughter and, that in fact it is her that is not meeting her obligations. My ex doesn't seem to grasp the fact the what I pay is only half of what's required to cover my daughter's essential needs (she should contribute the other half and is responsible for the spending of the whole amount towards her care). If I pay maintenance and buy her meals I am in effect paying twice.
She has text me to say that I do nothing for my child despite the above. I want to show that I don't have to buy the extras, but by doing so am doing more than obligated.
Is there any official guidance on what maintenance covers, what should be provided by the receiver and what should not?
I pay child maintenance weekly. This is arranged through child maintenance service.
My ex is now saying that as I have my child for meal times (not overnight) that I am solely responsible for providing those meals.
Now, I will obviously never allow my daughter to go without a meal however as a matter of principle I would like to show that by providing meals when my daughter is with me that I am actually going above and beyond as, the payment that I make through child maintenance meets my obligation to provide the essentials for our daughter and, that in fact it is her that is not meeting her obligations. My ex doesn't seem to grasp the fact the what I pay is only half of what's required to cover my daughter's essential needs (she should contribute the other half and is responsible for the spending of the whole amount towards her care). If I pay maintenance and buy her meals I am in effect paying twice.
She has text me to say that I do nothing for my child despite the above. I want to show that I don't have to buy the extras, but by doing so am doing more than obligated.
Is there any official guidance on what maintenance covers, what should be provided by the receiver and what should not?