Hi, guys.
New member here, from Scotland. Hope I don't ramble too much but here's the main part of my story.
Split up from wife in March last year and I moved out. We have one child together - a 2 year old daughter. At first I was popping into the house every day to see her for an hour or two or to take her out for a few hours. My daughter and I have always had a great relationship.
As the months passed some issues inevitably started to surface and there were some hiccups regarding visitation but we made arrangements for me to see my daughter all day on Tuesday, all day on Thursday, and an overnight on Saturday until Sunday evening.
For about a year this was the norm and it worked well. It meant both parents could work and I was able to take my daughter to swimming lessons and toddler groups and so on. Great times.
For the most part my ex-wife was fine. Everything changed about three months back though.
I had been working zero-hour contract jobs and struggled to find work that would fit around my visitation with my daughter. My wife works for the nursing bank and so her shifts are flexible and nurses don't do too badly, plus she has the money coming in from the Scottish Welfare Fund, Best Start Grants, Child Benefit, and so on. She's in a decent financial position.
I was not, and when she secured a mortgage and moved house a couple of months back I decided to speak with a mortgage advisor myself on the off-chance. I was approved but on the condition I was working the full-time post rather than relief worker post I had at the time.
I applied for the full-time position and start tomorrow morning (November 01).
The issue is the shift pattern. I will be working a 4-on; 4-off pattern, split shifts, starting at 0700 and finishing at 2200 with an extended lunch period. No time for contact with daughter.
My proposal is that I work the four days and then pick up daughter on the morning of day 5, returning her on the evening of day 8. This would then be the pattern.
My ex-wife is not for this at all and in four weeks we are up in court for a hearing to discuss residency. Her arguement is that daughter is established in a fixed pattern and there should be no deviation from that.
My relationship with my daughter can never realistically be questioned. I was there for her first crawl, first steps, first most things, and have been active in nursery, swimming lessons, gymnastics classes and generally we just have a great time, I would say perhaps to the point that my ex-wife feels threatened by it. When daughter is with me her mother is never mentioned but I know from what ex-wife tells me that I do get mentioned by daughter when I'm not there.
Ex-wife is trying to make out that I often don't show up for visitation every now and then and give no notice but I'm not really worried about any of that - this can all be proved as false by text messages or third-parties. I have been discussing with my solicitor my desire to (perhaps naively) go back to our old communication style when we got on. I can't honestly put my finger on why the sudden change of attitude by ex-wife. She wasn't happy when she found out about my mortgage appointment and even less happy to discover I had the full-time position starting. Surely a win for me is a win for daughter? It would be better for everyone if both parents have happy lives of their own independent from each other.
I do just get a horrible feeling that the court system might favour things as they are and so my time will remain limited. There were occasions when daughter has come to stay with me for four days, three nights, and both ex-wife and I worried how daughter might be in this situation, would she perhaps pine for 'home', that sort of thing. But in truth we had a great time and on those occasions daughter has not wanted to go back to her mother's and I am told her mother struggles on those night to get her to sleep. Pumped after seeing dad for four days.
Daughter is robust, she's seen dad move out and move house a couple of times and now mum move house as well yet she hasn't missed a beat. She's excelling at nursery and she's objectively the best swimmer in the lessons we go to. By all accounts she is thriving.
What do you guys think?
Will this shift pattern ruin my chances of getting this sort of 50-50 arrangement (more like 57-43)?
Will the courts see daughter's thriving as evidence that contact should remain as close to as-is as possible?
Are the courts likely to hold 50-50 as a potential target but implement steps in the process to that and I have certain checkpoints I have to meet along the way?
Is 50-50 actually the best option for daughter in the grand scheme of things?
Will the courts see her age (turns 3 in February) as being too tender to be getting punted back-and-forth between two different houses?
I get that there are no definitive answers to any of these questions and I'm going to spend some time digging around the forum reading about experiences of members here, I guess I'm just looking for some reassurance that when I pick up daughter from nursery today that our next contact won't be too far away and that one day I will have a court document securing my visitation rights.
Thanks for giving this your time,
50dad50
New member here, from Scotland. Hope I don't ramble too much but here's the main part of my story.
Split up from wife in March last year and I moved out. We have one child together - a 2 year old daughter. At first I was popping into the house every day to see her for an hour or two or to take her out for a few hours. My daughter and I have always had a great relationship.
As the months passed some issues inevitably started to surface and there were some hiccups regarding visitation but we made arrangements for me to see my daughter all day on Tuesday, all day on Thursday, and an overnight on Saturday until Sunday evening.
For about a year this was the norm and it worked well. It meant both parents could work and I was able to take my daughter to swimming lessons and toddler groups and so on. Great times.
For the most part my ex-wife was fine. Everything changed about three months back though.
I had been working zero-hour contract jobs and struggled to find work that would fit around my visitation with my daughter. My wife works for the nursing bank and so her shifts are flexible and nurses don't do too badly, plus she has the money coming in from the Scottish Welfare Fund, Best Start Grants, Child Benefit, and so on. She's in a decent financial position.
I was not, and when she secured a mortgage and moved house a couple of months back I decided to speak with a mortgage advisor myself on the off-chance. I was approved but on the condition I was working the full-time post rather than relief worker post I had at the time.
I applied for the full-time position and start tomorrow morning (November 01).
The issue is the shift pattern. I will be working a 4-on; 4-off pattern, split shifts, starting at 0700 and finishing at 2200 with an extended lunch period. No time for contact with daughter.
My proposal is that I work the four days and then pick up daughter on the morning of day 5, returning her on the evening of day 8. This would then be the pattern.
My ex-wife is not for this at all and in four weeks we are up in court for a hearing to discuss residency. Her arguement is that daughter is established in a fixed pattern and there should be no deviation from that.
My relationship with my daughter can never realistically be questioned. I was there for her first crawl, first steps, first most things, and have been active in nursery, swimming lessons, gymnastics classes and generally we just have a great time, I would say perhaps to the point that my ex-wife feels threatened by it. When daughter is with me her mother is never mentioned but I know from what ex-wife tells me that I do get mentioned by daughter when I'm not there.
Ex-wife is trying to make out that I often don't show up for visitation every now and then and give no notice but I'm not really worried about any of that - this can all be proved as false by text messages or third-parties. I have been discussing with my solicitor my desire to (perhaps naively) go back to our old communication style when we got on. I can't honestly put my finger on why the sudden change of attitude by ex-wife. She wasn't happy when she found out about my mortgage appointment and even less happy to discover I had the full-time position starting. Surely a win for me is a win for daughter? It would be better for everyone if both parents have happy lives of their own independent from each other.
I do just get a horrible feeling that the court system might favour things as they are and so my time will remain limited. There were occasions when daughter has come to stay with me for four days, three nights, and both ex-wife and I worried how daughter might be in this situation, would she perhaps pine for 'home', that sort of thing. But in truth we had a great time and on those occasions daughter has not wanted to go back to her mother's and I am told her mother struggles on those night to get her to sleep. Pumped after seeing dad for four days.
Daughter is robust, she's seen dad move out and move house a couple of times and now mum move house as well yet she hasn't missed a beat. She's excelling at nursery and she's objectively the best swimmer in the lessons we go to. By all accounts she is thriving.
What do you guys think?
Will this shift pattern ruin my chances of getting this sort of 50-50 arrangement (more like 57-43)?
Will the courts see daughter's thriving as evidence that contact should remain as close to as-is as possible?
Are the courts likely to hold 50-50 as a potential target but implement steps in the process to that and I have certain checkpoints I have to meet along the way?
Is 50-50 actually the best option for daughter in the grand scheme of things?
Will the courts see her age (turns 3 in February) as being too tender to be getting punted back-and-forth between two different houses?
I get that there are no definitive answers to any of these questions and I'm going to spend some time digging around the forum reading about experiences of members here, I guess I'm just looking for some reassurance that when I pick up daughter from nursery today that our next contact won't be too far away and that one day I will have a court document securing my visitation rights.
Thanks for giving this your time,
50dad50